Healthy & Livable City
Healthy & Livable Cities are characterized by high levels of civic pride, community engagement and a strong sense of place. Increasingly, livability and community health also are synonymous with sustainability. Maintaining health means not only having access to high quality health care, but also the facilities and services needed to maintain an active and healthy lifestyle, such as parks and trails.
The completion of the Temecula Valley Hospital was a major goal of the QLMP 2010, and was accomplished early in the decade. A network of health services has developed and the hospital now has plans to expand, including a new Behavioral Health facility. The hospital is working to attract new doctors to serve the growing population and to provide an expanding range of services. A barrier that many employers experience is high housing costs in Temecula. Through its 6th cycle Housing Element and other programs, the City is striving to create more “Attainable Housing” in the community. This is housing that is affordable to working people so that workers can live close to their jobs in Temecula.
The Blue Ribbon Committee is especially cognizant of the importance of addressing mental health, and this QLMP includes a measure of mental health in Temecula from the Strategic Health Alliance Pursuing Equity or “SHAPE” Riverside County health surveys. The experience of the COVID pandemic certainly reinforced the critical importance of avenues for social interaction and entertainment, but it is evident in normal everyday life that the ability of a place to nurture its residents spirits as well as their material needs is an essential aspect of livability. The City’s open spaces, libraries, museums, cultural and performance venues, places of worship, and entertainment spots provide a rich contribution to community life that is highly valued by its residents.
Indicator | Meets/Exceeds Goals | Progressing | Needs Improvement |
---|---|---|---|
Asthma (Goal: 9.5%) | 8.5% | ||
Adults with Diabetes (Goal: 10%; “Progressing” 10-13%; “Needs Improvement” 13%+) | 7.5% | ||
Adults Who are Sedentary (Goal: 21.2%; “Progressing” 21.2-29.6%; “Needs Improvement” >29.6) | 19.3% | ||
Poor Mental Health (Goal:16.1%) | 13.3% |
Indicator | Meets/Exceeds Goals | Progressing | Needs Improvement |
---|---|---|---|
Developed parklands: Goal: 5 acres per 1,000 residents; “Progressing” is 3.0-4.9 acres per 1,000 residents; “Need Improvement” is <3.0 acres per 1,000 residents) | 2.8 acres | ||
Accessible Parks: Percent of population within 15 minute walk of a neighborhood park: Goal: 85%; “Progressing” is 70-84%; “Needs Improvement” is <70% | 54% | ||
Pedestrian Use of Trails: Goal: Increase; “Progressing” is steady level; “Needs Improvement” is a decrease | Increasing | ||
Bicyclist Use of Trails Increase: Goal: Increase; “Progressing” is steady level; “Needs Improvement” is a decrease | Increasing |
Indicator | Meets/Exceeds Goals | Progressing | Needs Improvement |
---|---|---|---|
Library Use: Goal: Circulation greater than 700,000; “Progressing” is Circulation between 500,000 and 699,000; “Needs Improvement” is Circulation of 499,000 or less | 559,230 Circulation | ||
Visit to City Museums: Goal: Increase; “Progressing” is steady level; “Needs Improvement” is a decrease | Increasing | ||
Old Town Community Theater Ticket Sales: Goal: Increase; “Progressing” is steady level; “Needs Improvement” is a decrease | Increasing |
The survey acts as the City’s report card from the community. The purpose of the study is to assess perceptions of quality of life in the City and identify important issues and services. The survey gathers opinions on topics and has the residents rate the topics by level of priority (high priority vs. lower priority). It also evaluates perceptions of local government and customer services by rating the expectation level (exceeds expectations vs. not satisfied).
Exceeds Expectations or is a High Priority (>85%)
Progressing or is a Medium Priority (70-84%)
Not Satisfied or is a Lower Priority (<70%)
87.6%
Resident satisfaction with Overall Quality of Life
71.2%
Resident importance of providing senior services
81.7%
Resident satisfaction with senior services
62.8%
Resident importance of providing teen services
79.7%
Resident satisfaction with growth management and planning (commercial)
51.7%
Resident satisfaction with growth management and planning (residential)
90.8%
Resident satisfaction with the variety of parks and recreation facilities
62.1%
Resident importance of providing cultural arts, public art, theater and museum services
90.5%
Resident satisfaction with library services
85.4%
Resident satisfaction with the quality of education of Temecula Valley Unified School District
68.2%
For improved appearance of public infrastructure and landscapes
68.4%
Expand Teen services and programs
67.9%
Develop high quality arts, culture, history, and sporting events and facilities
67.4%
Increase recreational programs
At it’s core, residents desire that Temecula be a place where they can live through the arc of their entire lives, with housing and services for all ages, incomes, and abilities; a city that allows each resident to live life to their fullest and most satisfying potential.